ABSTRACT
The study was performed in five hospitals in Bangkok for a period of one year. All in- and outpatients who developed drug eruption from January to December 2001 were enrolled into the study. Physical examinations and complete history-taking were performed by one of the authors. A skin biopsy was done to confirm the diagnosis in every suspected case. Oral challenge test was performed to obtain a definite diagnosis only in some patients with informed consent. Among 212 patients, the most common causative drugs were antimicrobial agents with cephalosporin group in the highest rank. Maculopapular rash was the most common type of drug eruption followed by urticaria and photosensitivity reaction. It was concluded that antimicrobial agents were the predominant causative agents and maculopapular eruption was the most frequent clinical manifestation. New kinds of antimicrobial agents, anti-inflammatory drugs and lipid lowering agents could cause various patterns of drug eruption.
Subject(s)
Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Central Nervous System Agents/adverse effects , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Eruptions/diagnosis , Drug Utilization Review , Exanthema/chemically induced , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pharmacy Service, Hospital , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Thailand/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of 5 locally made clobetasol propionate creams compared with a brand name product. The study was divided into 3 parts 1) pharmacological study, 2) vasoconstriction test, and 3) double blind clinical trial. The results showed that the pharmacological properties of the locally made products were not different from the brand name product. Product C and D could diffuse through cellulose acetate membrane 3 fold more than the brand name product. Product D and E caused less vasoconstriction than the brand name product. This double blind study showed that all locally made products could improve psoriasis to the same extent as the brand name product, but there was more recurrence of psoriasis while using all the locally made products. It was concluded that locally made products were as effective as the brand name product in the treatment of psoriasis evaluated over a 2 week peroid, but more recurrence was observed with locally made products.